GROUP-CENTERED PREVENTION
Follow us!
  • Home
  • About
  • Teaching Reading
  • Reading Blog
  • Books
  • Reading News

The Reading Recovery Program: Why It Is Not a Good Idea

11/18/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
I write a column for The Group Psychologist that answers letters from teachers, school psychologists, and other group professionals.  However, I also often receive letters from parents.  So, I’m answering letters from parents here.  If you have a question, please contact me at the email link above. (Also see my earlier answer to Question #1.)
 
Question #2:  Last summer, the school sent home a letter for one of my children to be in a summer reading program.  Both of my children need help, but the school said only one could come.  They didn’t take the child that needed the most help.  Why did they not take both of my children?
 
The program that you are referring to is called Reading Recovery.  It has been around for well over 15 years, but, unfortunately, research does not support that it has ever been especially effective.  As a matter of fact, the national Department of Education states that over 60% of third graders across the nation cannot read at grade level during the period while whole language and programs like Reading Recovery have been used in the schools. 

Reading Recovery is also a very selective program; they typically take only children who they think can succeed.  Children who are struggling at a lower level are rarely ever selected.  That is why one child was selected and not both.

Reading Recovery does introduce phonics, but it relies mostly on old-style phonics rules and uses a somewhat disorganized approach for teaching phonics.  One research study even stated that improvement by students in the program was “almost zero” (Elbaum et al., 2000).  Other researchers have found major retention problems with the Reading Recovery approach.  Children seem to improve for a while, and then they become confused and start failing again. A group of more than 30 major reading researchers wrote an open letter to express their concern about Reading Recovery.

The big problem with Reading Recovery, as with whole language and “look say” methods, is that they all work from the faulty principle that reading is a “natural process,” that students will just normally learn to read if they receive enough exposure to literature.  Unfortunately, this myth has been disproved many times over the past 20 years.  The National Reading Panel, which published a nationwide study in 2000, states that whole language and other methods following these principles simply do not work.  The Reading Panel studied over 100,000 programs.  The Reading Panel concluded that reading must be taught and that phonemic awareness (not phonics rules) is the key.  Reading is not naturally acquired through exposure as spoken language is.  Unless you can memorize the entire unabridged dictionary, memorizing word lists will never teach a child to read effectively.  Children must learn that letters represent sounds, and they must learn how to decode or break words down into letter sounds, then put those sounds back together and say or pronounce the word. 

For more research on methods that work with students who are struggling in reading, look at my book:  After-School Prevention Programs for At-Risk Students:  Promoting Engagement and Academic Success.  It’s available in paperback. Many community libraries carry it or can secure a copy for you to read. You can also read an excellent article by Lorraine Hammond. She explains some of the problems with Reading Recovery.

You are right to question programs that do not seem to be working.  Often, it’s because they are not. 


It is sad that public schools cling to Reading Recovery even when it has been proven not to work.  Parents must go to their school administrators and request a more research-based program.  Unfortunately, there are also many universities training tomorrow’s teachers that are also still teaching the outdated and ineffective Reading Recovery program.  It is definitely time for a change.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Elaine Clanton Harpine, Ph.D.

    Elaine is a program designer with many years of experience helping at-risk children learn to read. She earned a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology (Counseling) from the Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    if you teach a child to read, you can change the world.

    Copyright 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Elaine Clanton Harpine 

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.